I recently decided to retire an HP Office Jet 6978 because Ink is just too expensive for not needing to print much anymore, and because it's a combo unit when the printer has issues, it either doesn't work at all, or complains So I decided to make an investment in a stand alone scanner because then it's paid for up front, and there when I need it. Hey all, may I jump aboard this conversation? It's an old thread, but I've had the same question recently as well. This is an ideal for post work if desired as the information can exceed the image itself (b/w or cooler range and resolution). For your prints consider learning to use a flatbed scanner with 600 or 1200 dpi tiff file. I find it also makes sense for higher end images (often slides and colour negs) to consider a quality commercial lab that can use high end scanners. I have used camera copy methods, flatbeds, and even have in storage a spare Minolta 5400 I scanner from years ago. An 8x10 at 1200dpi can be over 300 megs tiff file.
![best photo scanner for mac 2020 best photo scanner for mac 2020](https://sm.pcmag.com/t/pcmag_uk/guide/t/the-best-i/the-best-inkjet-printers-for-2020_gw5u.1200.jpg)
You don' need a high end flat bed scanner nor should you go with any interpolation for the highest dpi. For flat older photos being copied, the scanner is ideal and many suggest 300 dpi but I find that larger images do well at 600 dpi and smaller images at 1200 (especially if you plan to get any "digital restoration" done). Both would do better with a proper set up with a camera and the adjustments made accordingly. Similarly a warped photo that cannot be fully flattened also can be problematic. 35mm slides often get warped over time and that slight curve doesn't always translate to the sharpest scan possible. For film (negative and transparency) a flatbed scanner is perhaps higher in dpi but it also depends how the film is placed on the scanner. What do you plan to do with the copy file (scan or photo from your phone)? I'll try to keep this easy and condensed. Afterwards, go to the saved folder and load into Photoshop for quick cleanup/photo repair. You don't have to resize for each.drag the scan window down since is the same size and orientation. Do a preview scan, then set the scan window the size of the first photo. Try to keep the same orientation and fill the entire platten and can usually do 3 or 4 at a time. Slides are obvious (bump them up to 2400DPI) but prints (600DPI is sufficient) You are lucky that they are all 35mm, and hopefully 4圆.but some older ones could be 3.5x5 and hopefully none are the silk finish that was popular in the 1980's. Workflow: Create a destination folder, like "Scan" and if slides to maintain historic order, subfolders "Tray 1" etc. It gets down to a pattern that makes if quick. I have had several Epson scanners over the years and the scanning driver/software hasn't changed. I own the V550 and have used it extensively for copying both prints and slides.
![best photo scanner for mac 2020 best photo scanner for mac 2020](https://top6pro.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/B00IOGSZ04.jpg)
![best photo scanner for mac 2020 best photo scanner for mac 2020](https://cdn.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/8C9E9A21-9E2B-4697-969D-5296D170D773.jpeg)
Cropping excess is a non issue as I run all my scans through photoshop anyway for tone, scratch/dust removal, and even cropping the photo itself (correcting the old armature practice of showing they have feet, etc) or cropping an old Brownie 120 square to a 2:3 for printing. That would be both color balance consistency, and reflections if original photo has glossy finish, or under glass to hold original flat. Next, and perhaps more critical is lighting. Two major problems with iPhone (or even regular camera). procrastinating for another 10 years (or forever) because of the time involved of using the scanner.Īnyone done any comparisons or have any thoughts on this? What apps have you tried on the iPhone? I'm at the point of thinking it would be better for me to have them captured by the iPhone vs. assuming I scanned at 600DPI for example with the scanner (its capable of much higher resolution). What I'm curious about is what is the real quality/resolution difference between using the iPhone vs.
![best photo scanner for mac 2020 best photo scanner for mac 2020](https://i6k4q6f9.stackpathcdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/how-to-scan-on-mac.jpg)
It is much quicker to take pictures of old photographs with my iPhone. I frankly haven't had the time to really do it because scanning with a high quality scanner is very slow and time consuming.
#Best photo scanner for mac 2020 pro
Years ago I bought a fairly expensive Epson V750 Pro scanner and tried to star scanning a few times. I'm talking about thousands and thousands of pictures taken with 35mm of my family, and some heirloom photos from extended family that have passed way. We have a LOT of old photographs (and negatives) stored in boxes.